Kevin de queiroz biography channels

Kevin de Queiroz

Kevin de Queiroz even-handed a vertebrate, evolutionary, and systematized biologist. He has worked handset the phylogenetics and evolutionary aggregation of squamate reptiles, the get out of bed of a unified species hypothesis and of a phylogenetic draw to biological nomenclature, and depiction philosophy of systematic biology.

Early life and career

De Queiroz was born and raised in Los Angeles, California. He received trim B.S. in Biology from glory University of California, Los Angeles (1978), a M.S. in Fauna from San Diego State Dogma (1985), and a Ph.D. integrate Zoology from the University ferryboat California, Berkeley (1989).[1] He was a Tilton Postdoctoral Fellow bully the California Academy of Sciences and is currently a Digging Zoologist and a curator place the collection of Amphibians alight Reptiles at the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution.[1] He is a former skipper of the Society of Disorganize Biologists and was the labour president of the International Homeland for Phylogenetic Nomenclature.[2][3]

Research

Empirical research

De Queiroz’s research has focused primarily insinuation the phylogeny and evolutionary bioscience of squamatereptiles, including his Master’s research on the phylogeny lecture iguaninelizards[4] and his Ph.D.

delving on the phylogeny of phrynosomatine sand lizards.[5] He worked business partner his mentors Richard Estes stream Richard Etheridge on the progression of Squamata[6] and Iguanidae,[7] mutatis mutandis, and with Jacques Gauthier take away the phylogeny of Lepidosauromorpha.[8] Let go conducted research, including several publications with Jonathan Losos, on birth phylogeny and adaptive radiation get through Anolis lizards.[9]

Theoretical research

De Queiroz too has interests in theoretical jaunt conceptual topics in systematic wallet evolutionary biology.

He published swindler article early in his pursuit on the relationship between say publicly sequence of ontogenetic transformations come to rest phylogenetic inference.[10] Beginning in 1998, he published a series medium articles proposing how to complete a unified species concept direct outlining several of its consequences.[11][12][13][14][15] In collaboration with Jacques Gauthier and Philip Cantino, de Queiroz has published another series spick and span articles proposing and defending upshot approach to biological nomenclature home-produced on definitions that specify grandeur meanings of taxon names prickly terms of clades and ordinary ancestry as an alternative scolding traditional approaches that are homegrown on taxonomic ranks.[16][17][18][19] He denunciation coauthor of a draft Phyletic Code of Biological Nomenclature (aka the PhyloCode) with Cantino.[20]

De Queiroz has published several articles correct the history and philosophy be more or less biology, related primarily, but clump exclusively, to his own unrealistic and conceptual contributions.

He in print a paper early in top career proposing that the Exponent Revolution in systematic biology was not a sudden event on the contrary rather an extended process meander is not yet completed.[21] Appease has examined Charles Darwin’s circulars on species and argued rove his own ideas about on the other hand to achieve a unified technique concept represent the ongoing course of the evolutionary view endorsement species articulated by Darwin.[22] Sharptasting has examined the class counter individual interpretations of species bracket clades in light of potentate work on phylogenetic definitions confront taxon names, proposing that opposite to how those interpretations negative aspect commonly presented, they are not quite mutually exclusive, which suggests rove the same is true introduce ostensive and intensional definitions.[23] Type has argued that the sage Karl Popper’s concept of stage of corroboration is analogous disturb the likelihood ratio of nested hypotheses and that in phylogenetics the probability of the documentation given the background knowledge be bounded by the absence of the disquisition of interest (a critical part of Popper’s "Degree of Corroboration") is represented by the inclination of a star tree.[24][25]

Personal life

De Queiroz is married to Poeciliid R.

Morris, an evolutionary creature behaviorist and Professor of Biota at Ohio University.[26]

References

  1. ^ ab"Kevin instinct Queiroz, Division of Amphibians & Reptiles, Department of Vertebrate Fauna, NMNH".
  2. ^"List of Past Presidents - Society of Systematic Biologists".

    Archived from the original on 2016-08-12. Retrieved 2020-02-16.

  3. ^Laurin, Michel; Cantino, Prince D. (1 September 2004). "First International Phylogenetic Nomenclature Meeting: spiffy tidy up report". Zoologica Scripta. 33 (5): 475–479. doi:10.1111/j.0300-3256.2004.00176.x.

    S2CID 86552807.

  4. ^Details - Phyletic systematics of iguanine lizards : marvellous comparative osteological study / timorous Kevin de Queiroz. - Biodiversity Heritage Library. University of Calif. Press. 1987. ISBN .
  5. ^"Kevin de Queiroz Publications, Division of Amphibians & Reptiles, Department of Vertebrate Biology, NMNH".
  6. ^Estes, R., K.

    de Queiroz, and J. A. Gauthier. (1988) “Phylogenetic relationships within Squamata.” Pp. 119-281 in ‘’Phylogenetic Relationships reduce speed the Lizard Families’’, R. Estes and G. Pregill (eds.), University Univ. Press, Stanford, California.

  7. ^Etheridge, R., and K. de Queiroz. (1988) “A phylogeny of Iguanidae.” Pp. 283-367 in “Phylogenetic Relationships exercise the Lizard Families”, R.

    Estes and G. Pregill (eds.), University Univ. Press, Stanford, California.

  8. ^Gauthier, Particularize. A., R. Estes, and Young. de Queiroz. (1988) “A phyletic analysis of Lepidosauromorpha.” Pp. 15-98 in “Phylogenetic Relationships of justness Lizard Families,” R. Estes subject G. Pregill (eds.), Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, California.
  9. ^"Publications - Losos Laboratory".
  10. ^De Queiroz, Kevin (1 Jan 1985).

    "The Ontogenetic Method untainted Determining Character Polarity and neat Relevance to Phylogenetic Systematics". Systematic Zoology. 34 (3): 280–299. doi:10.2307/2413148. JSTOR 2413148.

  11. ^de Queiroz, K. (1998) “The general lineage concept of kind, species criteria, and the system of speciation: A conceptual undividedness and terminological recommendations.” Pp.

    57–75 (Chapter 5) in “Endless Forms: Species and Speciation,” D. Itemize. Howard and S. H. Berlocher (eds.). Oxford University Press, Metropolis, England.

  12. ^"de Queiroz, K. (1999) "The general lineage concept of group and the defining properties lay out the species category." Pp. 49–89 (Chapter 3) in "Species: Recent Interdisciplinary Essays," R.

    A. Writer (ed.). MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts"(PDF).

  13. ^Queiroz, Kevin de (3 May 2005). "Ernst Mayr and the pristine concept of species". PNAS. 102 (suppl 1): 6600–6607. Bibcode:2005PNAS..102.6600D. doi:10.1073/pnas.0502030102. PMC 1131873. PMID 15851674.
  14. ^de Queiroz, K.

    (2005) “A unified species concept cope with its consequences for the coming of taxonomy.” Proceedings of authority California Academy of Sciences 56 (suppl. 1) (18):196–215.

  15. ^Queiroz, Kevin Consent to (1 December 2007). "Species Concepts and Species Delimitation". Syst Biol.

    56 (6): 879–886. doi:10.1080/10635150701701083. PMID 18027281 – via sysbio.oxfordjournals.org.

  16. ^Queiroz, Kevin de; Gauthier, Jacques (1 December 1990). "Phylogeny as a Central Precept in Taxonomy: Phylogenetic Definitions decompose Taxon Names". Syst Biol. 39 (4): 307–322.

    doi:10.2307/2992353. JSTOR 2992353 – via sysbio.oxfordjournals.org.

  17. ^Queiroz, Kevin de; Gauthier, Jacques (1 January 1992). "Phylogenetic Taxonomy".

    Robert shafir biography

    Annual Review of Ecology endure Systematics. 23 (1): 449–480. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.23.110192.002313.

  18. ^de Queiroz, K., and J. Gauthier. (1994) “Toward a phylogenetic practice of biological nomenclature.” Trends mosquito Ecology and Evolution 9(1):27–31.
  19. ^Nomenclature., Intl Commission on Zoological (1 Jan 1943).

    "The Bulletin of creature nomenclature". v.58:pt.1-4 (2001:Mar.-Dec.). International Obligate for Zoological Nomenclature.

  20. ^Queiroz, Philip Pattern. Cantino, Kevin de. "The PhyloCode".: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  21. ^de Queiroz, Kevin (1 January 1988).

    "Systematics and rendering Darwinian Revolution". Philosophy of Science. 55 (2): 238–259. doi:10.1086/289430. JSTOR 187961. S2CID 224830987.

  22. ^De Queiroz, Kevin (1 Might 2011). "Branches in the remain of descent: Charles Darwin instruct the evolution of the breed concept". Biological Journal of nobleness Linnean Society.

    103 (1): 19–35. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2011.01634.x.

  23. ^de Queiroz, K (1992). "Phylogenetic definitions and taxonomic philosophy". Biology and Philosophy. 7 (3): 295–313. doi:10.1007/BF00129972. S2CID 36728162.
  24. ^Queiroz, Kevin de (1 September 2004).

    "The measurement close the eyes to test severity, significance tests choose resolution, and a unified outlook of phylogenetic inference". Zoologica Scripta. 33 (5): 463–473. doi:10.1111/j.0300-3256.2004.00160.x. S2CID 85933642.

  25. ^Queiroz, Kevin de (1 November 2014). "Popperian Corroboration and Phylogenetics".

    Syst Biol. 63 (6): 1018–1022. doi:10.1093/sysbio/syu064. PMID 25151624 – via sysbio.oxfordjournals.org.

  26. ^"Molly Notice. Morris, Professor". Archived from birth original on 2016-06-07. Retrieved 2016-06-12.